In the early years of the “space race” (1957-1975) two men sought to test a scientifically simple yet culturally complicated theory: that women might be innately better suited for space travel than men. In 1960 the thought of a woman in space was a radical one, and justifiably so. On the ground 75% of American women did not work outside the home and females were banned from military flight service altogether. In marriage, wives were required to have their husband’s permission to take out a bank loan, buy property, or purchase large household goods such as a refrigerator. Despite the social odds, a Harvard-educated surgeon and a U.S. Air Force General sought to determine if, from a purely practical perspective, women were suitable for space flight.

The latest look at the intersection of physiology, spaceflight and politics is captured in a new article entitled “A Forgotten Moment in Physiology: The Lovelace Woman in Space Program (1960-1962),” written by Kathy Ryan, Jack Loeppky and Donald Kilgore.

{ EurekAlert | Continue reading }

photo { Katerina Jebb }

previously { How many people are in space right now? }

flashback, space | October 30th, 2009